PortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and ^GSPC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FTA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FTA:

0.27

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

FTA:

0.54

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

FTA:

1.07

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FTA:

0.27

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

FTA:

0.86

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

FTA:

5.93%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

FTA:

17.59%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

FTA:

-62.45%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

FTA:

-6.10%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.75%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.


FTA

YTD

1.96%

1M

9.21%

6M

-3.03%

1Y

4.33%

3Y*

7.72%

5Y*

15.46%

10Y*

7.75%

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.79%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.35%

3Y*

15.30%

5Y*

15.37%

10Y*

10.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FTA vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTA is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTA is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTA is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTA is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTA is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTA is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FTA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

FTA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FTA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...